Hi Humans,
On the television news, they reported that a gun man was being held without bail for fatally shooting another human during an altercation because the victim had been texting in a movie theater. The shooter claimed he acted in self defense because the victim tried to punch him. The victim's wife who was sitting next to him in the theater says she did not see any punching and the texting occurred before the movie had started.
Really! As far as I can tell, the shooter is guilty. It does not make any difference if the victim had been texting. It does not even make a difference whether the victim had tried to punch the shooter. None of those things justify shooting another person with a gun. I don't know what the law is in that location, but for what possible reason did the shooter carry a gun into the movie theater? I am just a little dog with a little doggie brain, but it is obvious to me that the shooter is guilty. Not only is the shooter responsible for this tragedy, but so is the person who sold a gun to the shooter, and so is the gun culture that promotes private individuals to carry guns around with them, and so are the congressmen who allow such lax gun laws. I don't understand why you humans with your big human brains don't see it.
Chloe
No comments:
Post a Comment